Drawing for INNERSPACE/OUTERSPACE HEALTH AND BEAUTY

USPTO serial 75657238

INNERSPACE/OUTERSPACE HEALTH AND BEAUTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INNERSPACE/OUTERSPACE HEALTH AND BEAUTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT B G HOROWITZ

ROBERT B G HOROWITZ COOPER & DUNHAM LLP1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003health and beauty aids, namely, after shave lotions, after-sun lotions, anti-aging cream, anti-bacterial soap, astringents for cosmetic purposes, baby hair conditioner, bath gels, bath oils, bath pearls, bath powder, non-medicated bath salts, beauty masks, body cream, body emulsions, body mask creams, body mask lotions, body mask powders, body masks, body oils, body powders, body scrubs, cosmetic pencils, eye cream, hand cream, night cream, shaving cream, skin cream, skin cleansing cream, eye gels, eye makeup remover, eye makeup, eye pencils, eye shadow, facial cleansers, facial creams, facial emulsions, facial masks, facial scrubs, hair gel, shaving gel, shower gel, hair care preparations, hair lotion, hair pomades, lip gloss, lip liners, lipsticks, makeup remover, facial makeup, foundation makeup, skin moisturizer, nail polish, shampoo-conditioners, skin soap and sun tan lotionACTIVE—
004candlesACTIVE—
005nutritional supplementsACTIVE—
016printed diet plansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 3, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 23, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 29, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance