USPTO serial 75657246
VENTRILOQUIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VENTRILOQUIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey C. Katz
JEFFREY C KATZ DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019-4315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Communications services, namely voice broadcast and distribution services via telephone that allow the communicator to record one message and have it personalized and delivered to an unlimited number of individuals within short time frames | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 1999 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |