USPTO serial 75657399
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Selkirk Financial Technologies Inc.
Vancouver, B.C. V6B 4M9, CA
Other trademarks owned by Selkirk Financial Technologies Inc.
Selkirk Financial Technologies Inc.
Vancouver, B.C. V6B 4M9, CA
Other trademarks owned by Selkirk Financial Technologies Inc.
TORONTO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee E. Johnson
THEODORE D LIENESCH THOMPSON HINE LLP10 W SECOND ST2000 COURTHOUSE PLZ NEDAYTON, OH 45402| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for interfacing between financial institutions and corporate systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 15, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |