Drawing for CISIVE

USPTO serial 75657457

CISIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CISIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KAROL A KEPCHAR

KAROL A KEPCHAR AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP1676 INTERNATIONAL DRMCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for electronic commerce to allow users to perform electronic business transactions; computer software for electronic commerce security and consumer privacy for enabling users to control access to computer networks; computer software for reporting, data delivery, and electronic commerce fulfillmentACTIVE—
016Printed publications and materials, namely, books, magazines, newsletters, and pamphlets relating to computer software and information technology systemsACTIVE—
035Business consultation servicesACTIVE—
041Training and education services in the field of computers, computer systems or networks, computer software or computer programming; training and education services in the field of planning, designing, analyzing or development electronic business systems and softwareACTIVE—
042Computer consultation; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via telephone, e-mail, or in person; computer design services for others in the fields of electronic commerce, computer software, information technology, systems integration, and computer networking; custom software design for others; product development services; software programming for others; computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others; prototyping of web site designs for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 27, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 18, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 30, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 19, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 4, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance