USPTO serial 75658219
PROGRESSIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERENBURG, ANNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROGRESSIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISABETH H. COAKLEY ESQ
LISABETH H COAKLEY ESQ HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLC5445 CORPORATE DRTROY, MI 48098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical additives for printing inks, printing ink lacquers, printing ink varnishes, printing ink colorants, printing ink bases, printing ink coatings, and printing ink tints and dyestuffs; chemical additive that extends the life of water soluble printing inks and paper coatings; chemical defoamer additive for printing ink; chemical agents for faster drying of printing inks; industrial chemicals for use in the printing industry, namely, dust printing powder, printing auxiliaries being additives, namely, additives for fountain solutions, drying agents for printing inks, thixotrope agents for printing inks, stabilizing agents for printing inks, anti-drying agents for printing inks to prevent skinning and drying up of printing inks in cans, color boxes and inking feed rollers | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | printing ink products, namely, printing ink, printing ink vehicles, bases and dispersions; coatings in the nature of varnishes, lacquers and dispersions for use in the printing ink industry; colorants in the nature of tints, dyes and color pigments, for use in the manufacture of coating ink, printing ink, and printer ribbon ink; engraving ink; microencapsulated fragrance inks for flexographic printing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Progressive Ink Company, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Progressive Ink Company, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named PROGRESSIVE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |