USPTO serial 75658965
DT RESORTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DT RESORTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JASON M DRANGEL
JASON M DRANGEL BAZERMAN & DRANGEL, PC60 E 42ND ST STE 1158NEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Arranging, conducting, organizing, promoting, and providing personnel for conventions, conferences and trade exhibitions; operation and management of hotels, restaurants and take out food services for others; and retail stores and kiosks featuring clothing, sporting goods, food, toys, crafts, souvenirs, books and gifts | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Leasing property, namely, office space, stores and restaurants to others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Operating amusement and theme parks containing amusement park rides; arranging, sponsoring and providing facilities for sports matches, competitions, tournaments, and games, namely, facilities for baseball games, soccer games, skiing, boxing, wrestling, swimming, football, golf, and tennis; entertainment in the nature of theater productions, movie productions, and live music concerts movie theaters; movie studios; organizing art exhibitions; providing facilities for art exhibits; health club services; and providing recreational facilities, namely parks, pools, skating rinks, ski hills, and golf courses | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing facilities for conventions, conferences, trade exhibitions and fund-raising events; and hotel, nightclub, health spa, restaurant and take out food services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Heathmount A.E. Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DT RESORTS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |