USPTO serial 75659482
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Scotts Valley, CA
Scotts Valley, CA
Berkshire, RG12-1HN, GB
Berkshire, RG12-1HN, GB
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (IBM)
ARMONK, NY
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (IBM)
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (IBM)
ARMONK, NY
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (IBM)
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. IRIS HESS
M IRIS HESS LADAS & PARRY LAW OFFICE5670 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90036-5620UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MAGNETIC TAPE DRIVES; BLANK AND FORMATTED MAGNETIC COMPUTER TAPE CARTRIDGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER FIRMWARE AND SOFTWARE DRIVERS ALL FOR USE WITH TAPE DRIVES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | NEWSLETTERS, PAMPHLETS, BROCHURES, JOURNALS, MAGAZINES, BOOKS, PRINTED CATALOGS, PRINTED REPRINTS OF ARTICLES, PRINTED DATA SHEETS, PRINTED PRODUCT AND SYSTEM APPLICATION NOTES, PRINTED TECHNICAL BULLETINS, PRINTED PRODUCT AND SYSTEM OPERATING AND SERVICE MANUALS, ALL CONCERNING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR COMPUTER, ELECTRONIC, AND DATA PROCESSING PRODUCTS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; SERVICES IN DESIGNING DATA STORAGE DEVICE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS COMPRISING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE TO MEASURE AND ANALYZE DATA STORAGE DEVICES, TEXT PROCEDURES, METHODOLOGY AND THE DOCUMENTATION THEREFOR, FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |