Drawing for LTO ACCELIS

USPTO serial 75659482

LTO ACCELIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUTTON JR, WILLIAM D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LTO ACCELIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. IRIS HESS

M IRIS HESS LADAS & PARRY LAW OFFICE5670 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90036-5620UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MAGNETIC TAPE DRIVES; BLANK AND FORMATTED MAGNETIC COMPUTER TAPE CARTRIDGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER FIRMWARE AND SOFTWARE DRIVERS ALL FOR USE WITH TAPE DRIVESACTIVE—
016NEWSLETTERS, PAMPHLETS, BROCHURES, JOURNALS, MAGAZINES, BOOKS, PRINTED CATALOGS, PRINTED REPRINTS OF ARTICLES, PRINTED DATA SHEETS, PRINTED PRODUCT AND SYSTEM APPLICATION NOTES, PRINTED TECHNICAL BULLETINS, PRINTED PRODUCT AND SYSTEM OPERATING AND SERVICE MANUALS, ALL CONCERNING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWAREACTIVE—
042COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR COMPUTER, ELECTRONIC, AND DATA PROCESSING PRODUCTS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; SERVICES IN DESIGNING DATA STORAGE DEVICE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS COMPRISING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE TO MEASURE AND ANALYZE DATA STORAGE DEVICES, TEXT PROCEDURES, METHODOLOGY AND THE DOCUMENTATION THEREFOR, FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 4, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 13, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 21, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 18, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance