USPTO serial 75659665
INTEGRATED SERVICE MANAGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTEGRATED SERVICE MANAGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY H. GREENE
ATTN: TMSU MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1800 M ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5802UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SERVICE AND NETWORK MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORK SERVICE PROVIDERS, PERFORMING CONFIGURATION AND PROVISIONING, TOPOLOGY, PERFORMANCE, FAULT AND SECURITY MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING FUNCTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |