Drawing for WINGS ALLIANCE

USPTO serial 75659819

WINGS ALLIANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THAYER, GARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WINGS ALLIANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMIE NAFZIGER

JAMIE NAFZIGER DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 S SIXTH STSTE 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer Software in the Field of Travel for Booking Flights, Hotel Reservations, Ground Transportation, and ToursACTIVE—
016Printed Publications, Namely, Pamphlets, Brochures, Newsletters, Journals, Magazines, and Catalogs, Featuring Information About Travel and Related Transportation and Lodging AccommodationsACTIVE—
039Air Transportation Services for Passengers, Goods, and Mail; Arranging Travel Tours; Travel Related Services, Namely, Charter Airline Services, Arranging for Flight and Vehicle Reservations for others; and Providing a Web Site Featuring Information Primarily About Travel and TransportationACTIVE—
042Making Hotel, Lodging, and Rental Car Reservations for OthersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 7, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 22, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 28, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 5, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 18, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 23, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 18, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance