USPTO serial 75659877
MAXX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allen D. Brufsky
ALLEN D BRUFSKY UNIT 8010700 STRINGFELLOW RDBOKEELIA, FL 33922UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BATTERIES FOR USE WITH PORTABLE VIDEO EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 16, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |