USPTO serial 75660022
COMPONENTS THAT MAKE E-COMMERCE WORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMPONENTS THAT MAKE E-COMMERCE WORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jamie J. Fitzgerald
JAMIE J FITZGERALD CUMMINGS & LOCKWOODP O BOX 1960NEW HAVEN, CT 06509-1960UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PROPRIETARY COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGNED TO FACILITATE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS, NAMELY, THE ONLINE PROCUREMENT AND SALES OF GOODS AND SERVICES BETWEEN BUSINESS PARTNERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, FACILITATING THE PROCUREMENT AND SALES OF GOODS AND SERVICES BETWEEN BUSINESS PARTNERS BY MEANS OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT FACILITATES ELECTRONIC COMMERCE BETWEEN BUSINESS PARTNERS VIA THE GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |