USPTO serial 75660419
ULTRALOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTRALOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine J. Holland
CATHERINE J HOLLAND KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ACCESSORIES FOR POWER OPERATED DRIVER DRILLS AND POWER SCREWDRIVERS, NAMELY DRILL BITS, SCREWDRIVERS BITS, INSERT BITS, FINDER/DRIVER, QUAD-DRIVERS, SOCKET ADAPTERS, SOCKETS, ABRASIVES, ROUTERS, STORAGE CASES, HEX SHANK DRILL BITS, WOOD-BORING BITS, COUNTERSINKS, PLUG CUTTERS, STEP BITS, A CONNECTOR WHICH ALLOW FOR THE CHUCK AND ACCESSORIES TO BE ATTACHED TO POWER OPERATED DRIVER DRILLS AND POWER SCREWDRIVERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |