Drawing for CONTENTGUARD

USPTO serial 75660855

CONTENTGUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CONTENTGUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DON L. WEBBER

DON L WEBBER XEROX CORPORATIONP O BOX 1600800 LONG RIDGE RDSTAMFORD, CT 06904

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing multiple-user access to the internet; electronic transmission of documents via the internetACTIVEJun 8, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2003ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jun 30, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 30, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 30, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 30, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 7, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 6, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance