USPTO serial 75660925
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Orlando, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Bertagnolli
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DR STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting and organizing golf-related sporting events, promoting the sale of the goods and/or services of others by arranging for sponsors to affiliate their goods and services with golf-related sporting events and occurrences, advertising and business services, namely, the preparation of audiovisual programs, commercials and other communications media for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Cable, wireless cable and/or satellite television broadcasting services for golf-related subject matter | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Producing and distributing entertainment and educational programming to cable, wireless cable and/or satellite television broadcasting systems featuring golf-related subject matter and providing golf-related information via a global information network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 22, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |