Drawing for ONLINEMETALS.COM

USPTO serial 75661315

ONLINEMETALS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BONNET, ODETTE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONLINEMETALS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Sprinkle

DAVID J SPRINKLE LASHER HOLZAPFEL SPERRY & EBBERSON2600 TWO UNION SQ601 UNION STSEATTLE, WA 98101-4000

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail and wholesale distributorship on the global information network of stainless steel, hot roll steel, aluminum and other industrial metals manufactured by othersACTIVEJul 4, 1997
040Custom processing of stainless steel, hot roll steel, aluminum and other industrial metals to the order and specification of othersACTIVEJul 4, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 4, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 26, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 7, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 27, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance