USPTO serial 75661780
DD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUKEN, BONNIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald L. Israel
ROSE AUSLANDER CARTER LEDYARD & MILBURN LLP2 WALL STNEW YORK, NY 10005-2072UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | MAIL ORDER SERVICES FEATURING CUFFLINKS, TIE CLIPS AND OTHER ASSORTED JEWELRY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRINCE DIMITRI, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Karageorge, Dimitri
- Other trademarks owned by Karageorge, Dimitri
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named DD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |