USPTO serial 75661802
CONTROLLING THE DIGITAL REVOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONTROLLING THE DIGITAL REVOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEAL M COHEN
STEVE A WONG DISCOVISION ASSOCIATESPO BOX 19616IRVINE, CA 92623UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic remote controls for use in controlling consumer electronics and home automation electronics, namely, televisions, ATVs (Advanced televisions), VCRs, DVD players, CD players, radios, home security systems, set-top boxes, cable receivers, satellite receivers, baby monitors, and base stations used as a communication link between the remote controls and the controlled electronics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EREMOTE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EREMOTE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VSIS, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by RESEARCH INVESTMENT NETWORKS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CONTROLLING THE DIGITAL REVOLUTION
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |