USPTO serial 75661969
FEEL FRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FEEL FRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL A SMITH
MICHAEL A SMITH CARLILE PATCHEN & MURPHY LLP366 BROAD STCOLUMBUS, OH 43215UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | FEMININE HYGIENE PADS, PANTY SHIELDS, PANTY LINERS AND TAMPONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2000 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |