USPTO serial 75662230
AMERICA'S ONE AND ONLY INSIDE INFORMATION SOURCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMERICA'S ONE AND ONLY INSIDE INFORMATION SOURCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth Kotran
BETH KOTRAN AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Publications, namely, a general features, business an financial newsletter; a general features, business and financial magazine; and a newsletter column in the field of finance and business | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and providing information about the goods and services of others in articles through an electronic magazine accessed through a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |