Drawing for INSPIRATIONS

USPTO serial 75663970

INSPIRATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAIN, CATHERINE P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSPIRATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William F. Lawrence

WILLIAM F LAWRENCE FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metal building panels, non-metal boards for wall paneling and facades, non-metal partition walls, excluding windowsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 20, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 20, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 23, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 3, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 1, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 25, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 14, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 31, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance