Drawing for POLYPHOR

USPTO serial 75663982

POLYPHOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POLYPHOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001ORGANIC CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES WITH LOW TO MEDIUM MOLECULAR WEIGHT, AND RESINS FOR SOLID PHASE ORGANIC SYNTHESIS OF SMALL TO MEDIUM MOLECULES FOR USE IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL, AGROCHEMICAL AND COSMETIC INDUSTRIES, IN THE FORM OF INTERMEDIARY PRODUCTS FOR RESEARCH AND TESTINGACTIVEFeb 11, 1998
042CHEMICAL CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF ORGANIC CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES WITH LOW TO MEDIUM MOLECULAR WEIGHT, AND IN THE FIELD OF RESINS FOR SOLID PHASE ORGANIC SYNTHESIS OF SMALL TO MEDIUM MOLECULESACTIVEFeb 11, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 29, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Mar 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 23, 2002NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED
Sep 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 23, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 2001REINREINSTATED
Jun 19, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
May 8, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance