USPTO serial 75664370
PROMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2632160Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 8, 2002
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MERCURY COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
TEMECULA, CA
Other trademarks owned by MERCURY COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Oxnard, CA
Oxnard, CA
Oxnard, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn J. Dickinson
Glenn J. Dickinson LIGHTGABLER LLP760 PASEO CAMARILLO, SUITE 400CAMARILLO, CA 93010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Golf equipment, namely, head covers, club heads, golf shafts, grips, golf balls, and golf tees | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 29, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MERCURY COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Gould, Terence
- Other trademarks owned by Gould, Terence
- Other trademarks owned by Gould, Terence
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named PROMAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 8, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 4, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 3, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |