USPTO serial 75664412
XCELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XCELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter C. Lando
PETER C LANDO WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Traveling bridge filter for industrial water and wastewater applications | ACTIVE | May 27, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |