Drawing for PROTECTSMART

USPTO serial 75664615

PROTECTSMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROTECTSMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CATHERINE MENNENGA

CATHERINE MENNENGA GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY3135 EASTON TPKEFAIRFIELD, CT 06828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Membership clubs offering credit/debit card registration, reporting loss or theft of credit/debit cards of members to relevant parties; providing informational reports on businesses; providing reports on Global Computer Network privacy guidelines; providing registration of important personal documents, attorney referral services, and price quotation services for the service of othersACTIVE—
036Insurance underwriting in the fields of life, health, accident, home, apartment, automobile; membership clubs offering emergency cash advances; reimbursement for fraudulent credit/debit card use; replacement of lost or stolen credit/debit cards; providing discounts and rebates on home and auto security and alarm products and services of others; providing temporary cash loans for damage to or theft from a homeACTIVE—
042Home security services in the nature of providing a deterrent to home burglaries through offering monetary rewards for assisting in the arrest and conviction of persons involved in home burglaries; providing devices used in personal inventorying of household items for security purposes, namely, a home defense manual containing recommendations for safeguarding your home, photo security portfolio, and a home inventory record and vacation checklist; membership clubs offering credit reports, social security benefits records, driving records, medical records, vehicle identification number reports to membersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 13, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 13, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 22, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 14, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 13, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 16, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance