Drawing for SIRAS

USPTO serial 75665055

SIRAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUTTON JR, WILLIAM D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIRAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerald E. Nagae

JERALD E NAGAE CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON & KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036CREDIT CARD AND CHECK VERIFICATION FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2002ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 20, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 9, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance