USPTO serial 75665924
JUST PUSH PLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DICKINSON, RODNEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUST PUSH PLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell H. Stabbe
MITCHELL H STABBE DOW, LOHNES & ALBERTSON, PLLC1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE N WSTE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic entertainment systems comprised of audio and video equipment, namely, amplifiers, antennas, audio mixers, audio tape recorders, cables, video cassette recorders, compact disc players and recorders, digital audio tape players and recorders, DVD players and recorders, television sets, screens, loudspeakers, loudspeaker cabinets, video monitors, motion picture cameras, optical discs, phonographs, cameras, movie projectors, radios, receivers, tuners, transceivers, transmitters, video cameras, wires, preamplifiers, tone controls, control systems surround processors, digital-to-analog converters, analog-to-digital converters, switch boxes, speakers, and power supplies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |