USPTO serial 75666184
EXPANDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 5, 2002
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EXPANDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CLEVELAND, OH
CLEVELAND, OH
Cleveland, OH
EMERSON NETWORK POWER, ENERGY SYSTEMS, NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Lorain, OH
Other trademarks owned by EMERSON NETWORK POWER, ENERGY SYSTEMS, NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S. Svat
JOSEPH E WALSH JR HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLC7700 BONHOMME, STE 400SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HOUSINGS FOR COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, CABINETS FOR HOUSING FEEDER AND DISTRIBUTION CABLES AND CONNECTIONS THEREFORE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MARCONI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MARCONI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RELTEC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by EMERSON NETWORK POWER, ENERGY SYSTEMS, NORTH AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EXPANDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |