USPTO serial 75666348
FULLPOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 16, 2007
- Examiner
- CHOSID,ROBIN S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with FULLPOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori Stockton Kozak
Lori Stockton Kozak Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox Drive, Building 3Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Temporary use of online, nondownloadable software for uploading to and downloading ephotos and digital images from computers for exchanging information over global communications networks; [ temporary use of online, nondownloadable software for ecommerce or electronic commerce applications; ] temporary use of online nondownloadable software for use in the creation, enhancement, modification, transmission, reception, exchange, storage and synchronization of information, messages, [ multimedia files, ] ephotos, photographic and graphic files and images | ACTIVE | Jul 6, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FullPower Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FullPower Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FullPower Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FULLPOWER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 12, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |