USPTO serial 75666514
Serial No. 75666514
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75666514?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | NON-METAL PROTECTIVE COLLARS FOR PLACEMENT AROUND TREES AND/OR SHRUBS AT GROUND LEVEL TO PROTECT THE TREE BARK FROM DAMAGE BY LAWN MOWERS OR WEED CUTTING DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |