USPTO serial 75666761
PHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R W JOHNSTON
R W JOHNSTON CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE, LLPP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; integrated circuits; and software for controlling and using integrated circuits excluding therefrom hardware and software especially for use in the agricultural related customer industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |