USPTO serial 75666966
HOSPITALITY EXCELLENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 8, 2000
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOSPITALITY EXCELLENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer V. Whiting
Jennifer V. Whiting Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP221 N. Figueroa Street, Suite 1200Los Angeles, CA 90012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of hospitality | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 8, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |