USPTO serial 75667006
STRIKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STRIKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger P. Furey, Esq., Sylvia D. Davis, Esq.
ROGER P FUREY ESQ SYLVIA D DAVIS E KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS ROSENMAN1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic controller systems for grenade launchers comprising a video image processor, a ballistic computer, a video sight, and a laser range finder; and an optical lens sight for grenade launchers | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Firearms; namely, grenade launchers; stands, triggers and firing mechanisms for grenade launchers; and ammunition for grenade launchers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL DYANAMICS ARMAMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NEW COLT HOLDING CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by NEW COLT HOLDING CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Similar marks named STRIKER
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |