USPTO serial 75667030
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY- ENHANCING MOBILITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY- ENHANCING MOBILITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian D. Walker
BRIAN D WALKER HOWISON & ARNOTT5420 LBJ FREEWAY, STE 660DALLAS, TX 75240UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic devices for replaying messages aloud in and around vehicles, and illuminated signs used on vehicles | ACTIVE | May 22, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Recorders, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Recorders, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY- ENHANCING MOBILITY
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |