USPTO serial 75667069
RED ZONE MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2798007Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 23, 2003
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RED ZONE MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J. Schlue
Daniel J. Schlue Black, McCuskey, Souers & Arbaugh LPA220 Market Avenue SouthSuite 1000Canton, OH 44702Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS TO MANAGE AND CONDUCT SALES TRANSACTIONS; AND CONDUCT BUSINESS ANALYSIS BASED ON THE DATA GATHERED FOR RETAIL SITES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 24, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DRB Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DRB Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DRB Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named RED ZONE MANAGEMENT
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 13, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |