USPTO serial 75667475
BLISS!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLISS!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert S. Stoll
ROBERT S STOLL STOLL, MISKIN, PREVITO, HOFFMAN & BADIE4710 EMPIRE STATE BLDGNEW YORK, NY 10118UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | on-line website in the field of weddings, wedding preparation, engagement and wedding parties and engagement and wedding gifts | ACTIVE | Mar 10, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |