USPTO serial 75667905
PREFERRED SOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 28, 2002
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PREFERRED SOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FARMINGDALE, NY
New Hyde Park, NY
New Hyde Park, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Panagiota Betty Tufariello
PANAGIOTA BETTY TUFARIELLO JASPAN SCHLESINGER HOFFMAN LLP300 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530-3302UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | soy based snacks and desserts, namely, chocolate, rice, vanilla, and tapioca puddings, and cheesecake | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 28, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 28, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |