USPTO serial 75667936
SYNERGY MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SYNERGY MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DENNIS L COOK
DENNIS L COOK FOWLER WHITE GILLEN BOGGS ET AL501 E KENNEDY BLVD STE 1900TAMPA, FL 33602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DEVELOPING PROMOTIONAL MARKETING CAMPAIGNS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, DEVELOPING AND DISSEMINATION OF EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS OF OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF PHARMACY; PROVIDING INCENTIVES TO PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONS TO DEMONSTRATE EXCELLENCE IN THE FIELD OF PHARMACY; AND CONDUCTING SEMINARS, CONFERENCES, AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF PHARMACY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |