Drawing for ENDURANCE PLUS

USPTO serial 75667973

ENDURANCE PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAIN, CATHERINE P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENDURANCE PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Fishman

MICHAEL D FISHMAN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC1533 N WOODWARD AVESTE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007SPARK PLUG WIRES AND SPARK PLUG WIRE SETSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2003ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 3, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 11, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 4, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 10, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 12, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 12, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 4, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2001CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
Dec 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 6, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance