Drawing for FRUIT FOR THOUGHT

USPTO serial 75668103

FRUIT FOR THOUGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HORRALL, PATRICIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRUIT FOR THOUGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heidi Howard Tandy

HEIDI HOWARD TANDY RUDEN, MCCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER200 E BROWARD BLVDFT LAUDERDALE, FL 33302UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beverages, namely fruit juices, fruit drinks, fruit juice concentrates, aerated fruit juices, fruit nectars, fruit punch, fruit flavored drinks, fruit drinks made with fruit, fruit juices and fruit flavors, lemonade, mineral waters, seltzer water, drinking water, aerated waters, spring waters, soda waters, soft drinks, sports drinks containing fruit flavors, fruit concentrates and syrups for use in the making of fruit drinks and fruit juices, and fruit drinks containing added nutrients, minerals, herbs and vitaminsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Dec 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 18, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance