USPTO serial 75668407
GOTFRESH.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOTFRESH.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caroline H. Mead
CAROLINE H MEAD GRAHAM & JAMES LLPONE MARITIME PLZ STE 300SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ON-LINE SHOP AT HOME SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF GROCERIES; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE DATABASE FEATURING GROCERY STORE INFORMATION, NAMELY PRODUCT INFORMATION AND PRICING | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARD FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS FEATURING GROCERY STORE INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | DELIVERY OF GROCERIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Link Logistics System, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Link Logistics System, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named GOTFRESH.COM
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |