USPTO serial 75668840
AVENUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AVENUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell E. Radin
MITCHELL E RADIN COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP41 MADISON AVE 34TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | HAIR STYLING SERVICES, HAIR DRESSING SALONS, BEAUTY SKIN CARE SALONS, PERSONAL GROOMING SERVICES, NAMELY, SKIN, NAIL, AND HAIR CARE SERVICES, AND CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SKIN, NAIL, HAIR CARE, AND BEAUTY CARE TIPS, NAIL CARE SERVICES, NAMELY, MANICURING AND PEDICURING, HEALTH SPA SERVICES, HEALTH AND BEAUTY RESORT SERVICES, PHYSICAL FITNESS CONSULTATION, FOOD NUTRITION CONSULTING SERVICES, NUTRITION COUNSELING SERVICES, BEAUTY SERVICES, NAMELY, BODY WAXING SERVICES, CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF CLOTHING WARDROBE PLANNING, HOME INTERIOR DECORATING SERVICES, HOME INTERIOR DECORATION CONSULTATION SERVICES, COLOR COSMETIC CONSULTING SERVICES, PERSONAL SHOPPING FOR OTHERS, CATERING PLANNING FOR PARTIES, COOKING CONSULTATION SERVICES, INTERIOR DECORATING, INTERIOR DECORATION CONSULTATION, CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS, PERSONAL, AND SOCIAL ETIQUETTE, BEAUTY AND HAIR SALON SERVICES, MASSAGE SERVICES, AROMATHERAPY SERVICES, DATING SERVICES, CATERING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |