Drawing for CYBERSTEREO

USPTO serial 75668943

CYBERSTEREO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYBERSTEREO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer R. Searl

JENNIFER R SEARL BROWN, RUDNICK, FREED & GESMERONE FINANCIAL CTRBOSTON, MA 02111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009machine vision and inspection products incorporating a two- and three-dimensional camera-based inspection method for use in inspecting various package types including "ball grid arrays," "chip scale packages," "quad flat packs" and "thin small outline packages" used in the back end semi-conductor industryACTIVEJan 26, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 28, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance