USPTO serial 75668948
INFORMATION THAT MATTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 27, 2004
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INFORMATION THAT MATTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MINNETONKA, MN
Minnetonka, MN
Minnetonka, MN
Minnetonka, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Peter Hochberg
D. Peter Hochberg D. Peter Hochberg Co., L.P.A.1940 East 6th St. - 6th FloorCleveland, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Credit bureau report services namely,providing credit bureau data to consumers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 26, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CPP NORTH AMERICA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Metris Direct, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Metris Direct, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Metris Direct, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named INFORMATION THAT MATTERS
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |