USPTO serial 75669305
MEDITERRANEAN GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2820514Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 2004
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MEDITERRANEAN GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PROCESSED FOODS, NAMELY, CANNED VEGETABLES AND FRUITS, JAMS, PICKLES, TOMATO PASTE, PROCESSED BEANS, PRESERVED TRUFFLES, SESAME OILS, AND DAIRY BASED VEGETABLE DIP | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 28, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |