USPTO serial 75669776
STICKY SNEAKY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STICKY SNEAKY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sherman Oaks, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY SKI BOOTS, SHIRTS, BLAZERS, OVERCOATS, RAINCOATS, SPORT COATS, HEADBANDS, WRISTBANDS, WIND RESISTANT JACKETS, JACKETS, BAGGY SHORTS, BAGGY SHIRTS, LIGHT REFLECTING JACKETS, LIGHT REFLECTING COATS, JUMP SUITS, JOGGING SUITS, NECK BANDS, POLO SHIRTS, POLO SHORTS, SPORT SHORTS, SWIM TRUNKS, PULLOVERS, T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, ATHLETIC UNIFORMS, BOXER SHORTS, CAPS, GOLF SHIRTS, RAINCOATS, RAINWEAR, SUN VISORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2003 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |