USPTO serial 75669917
WESTERN INTERIORS & DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 2, 2002
- Examiner
- GRUNDY, JUDITH A
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WESTERN INTERIORS & DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary Kibel, Esq.
JAMES M GIBSON POWLEY & GIBSON PC304 HUDSON ST 2ND FLNEW YORK, NY 10013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazine published by-monthly focusing on interior decorating, architecture, design, art, antiques and lifestyle in the American West | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 19, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Decker, Carol A.
- Other trademarks owned by Decker, Carol A.
- Other trademarks owned by WESTERN INTERIORS AND DESIGN, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named WESTERN INTERIORS & DESIGN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Jul 1, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | โ |
| Jun 2, 2008 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | โ |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Nov 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | โ |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | โ |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | โ |
| Nov 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Nov 9, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Apr 29, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Jul 2, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Jan 30, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Jan 24, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Sep 10, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | โ |
| Jan 2, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jan 2, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | โ |
| Nov 21, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline โ usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Oct 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |