USPTO serial 75669924
INKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE RETAIL SERVICES FEATURING GENERAL MERCHANDISE, NAMELY, AUTOMOBILES, FURNITURE, BOOKS, MAGAZINES, JEWELRY, CLOTHING, PERSONAL COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, PRERECORDED VIDEOS AND MOVIES IN DVD OR VHS FORMAT, ELECTRONICS, MUSIC, FLOWERS, GIFTS, OFFICE SUPPLIES, HOME SUPPLIES, GAMES, TOYS, PETS, FOOD, WINE, FRAGRANCES AND COSMETICS; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PREPARING AND PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS ON ELECTRONIC WEB PAGES ACCESSED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS VIA AN ON-LINE ELECTRONICS COMMUNICATION NETWORK; PROVIDING, BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, PRICING INFORMATION AND PRICE COMPARISON DATA ANALYSIS ABOUT THE ON-LINE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FEATURING TRADE INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF ON-LINE RETAILING IN GENERAL AND PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT THE SPECIFIC ON-LINE RETAIL SERVICES OF OTHERS IN PARTICULAR; PROVIDING ON-LINE BUSINESS DIRECTORIES FEATURING LISTINGS OF THE ON-LINE RETAIL SERVICES OF OTHERS; PROVIDING ON-LINE SHOPPERS' GUIDE INFORMATION SERVICES VIA THE INTERNET; AND COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE GIFT REGISTRY AND GIFT ORDERING SERVICES WHICH MATCH THE GIFT GIVER'S REQUIREMENTS WITH THE GIFT RECIPIENT'S WANTS AND NEEDS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | TTBN | CASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |