Drawing for SOLUS

USPTO serial 75670518

SOLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SOLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia Clarke Weber

CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER SUGHRUE, HION, ZINN, MACPEAK & SEAS2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic apparatus for controlling access to computers and computerized systems; computer software for controlling access to computers and computerized systems; electronic apparatus for generating codes for accessing computers and computerized systems; computer software for generating codes for accessing computers and computerized systems; electronic apparatus for controlling access to banking services, savings and investment services, and transaction authorization and settlement services, and computer software for controlling access to banking services, savings and investment services, transaction authorization and settlement services; electronic apparatus for generating codes for accessing banking services, savings and investment services and transaction authorization and settlement services and computer software for generating codes for accessing banking services, savings and investment services, and transaction authorization and settlement services; encoded security passes; magnetically encoded and encodeable credit, debit, charge, cash withdrawal, and banking services access cardsACTIVE—
036magnetically encoded credit, debit, charge, cash withdrawal and banking service access card services; consultation services in the area of controlling access to banking services, savings and investment services and financial transaction authorization and settlement servicesACTIVE—
042consultation services in the area of security, computer hardware, computer software; computer software design for others; installation and maintenance of computer software; computer system analysis; consultation services in the field of controlling access to computers and computerized systems; and leasing of electronic apparatus and computer software for accessing financial services, and transaction authorization and settlement servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 26, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 4, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance