USPTO serial 75670576
JALDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JALDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrienne L. White
ADRIENNE L WHITE BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHIS, LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SERVERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR FACILITATING ELECTRONIC PAYMENT VIA GLOBAL AND LOCAL COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES RELATING TO THE TRANSFERRALS OF PAYMENT VIA MOBILE AND STATIONARY NETWORKS, GLOBALLY AND LOCALLY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |