USPTO serial 75670779
VITAMIN CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VITAMIN CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Menlo Park, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JUNJI SUZUKI
JUNJI SUZUKI CHAN, DOI, MARSHALL & LEAL, LLP220 MONTGOMERY ST STE 900SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-3402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | nutritional products, namely, vitamins, herbal teas for medical purposes containing vitamins and nutritional supplements containing vitamins | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 1998 |
| 035 | retail store and mail order catalog services featuring nutritional products, namely, vitamins and nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |